A corrupt judge commits crime against humanity says segay

 Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) Chairman Itse Sagay (SAN) yesterday came hard on those condemning the arrest of two Supreme Court justices and other judges by the Department of State Services (DSS), saying such critics ignore the implications of judicial corruption. According to him, it is as if a corrupt judge is committing a crime against humanity because he holds the power of life and death and is expected by the society to be above board. Prof. Sagay said where a society loses confidence in the judiciary, it would resort to self-help. He spoke in Abuja at a news conference by PACAC to review its activities since it was established last August by President Muhammadu Buhari. There have been some criticisms of the arrests. Some said the rights of the judges were trampled, others said it was an attack on the judiciary. Sagay thinks many Nigerians do not appreciate the sincerity of the Federal Government's anti-corruption battle, saying it was as if many preferred the old order, which he said would have made Nigeria worse than Zimbabwe He said: "I think that those who have criticised the DSS and the manner the search was conducted or even criticised the whole idea of a search being conducted seem not to have looked at the implications of judicial corruption. "At the end of the day when there is corruption anywhere, who do you take the matter to? It is to the judge. The judge is the ultimate and, in fact, the buck stops at his court. So, if that judge is complicit in the corruption then that is the end of the fight against corruption. That is the awful implication! "So, any judge who is corrupt is committing a crime - in fact, one can even say it's a crime against humanity because it just destroys our confidence in a system which should sustain the state in law and order. It encourages people to resort to self-help because there is no hope in taking a matter to court." Sagay said the judiciary became so corrupt that it endorsed violent elections in which thousands died. "Today, just to give an example, we have some sitting governors who we all knew that they did not win an election. Because they killed their way into office, people are still dying in those states, for them to sustain themselves in that office. "Yet some courts at the highest level gave approval to the process that brought those people to what I would call their bloody seats on which they are sitting. These are some of the things we are talking about. If the judiciary is corrupt, the only body, the only arm of government that has the power of life and death over Nigerians, if they are corrupt, then it is frightening," he said. Sagay believes many commentators ignored the monies allegedly found on the judges, saying: "The other thing that surprises me is that a lot of people have made commentaries criticising what has been happening and have ignored the outcome of these searches completely. "Isn't it enough that billions of naira was found in private residences? Don't you associate these billions of Naira with the fact that your roads are in a state of disrepair, that your hospitals are under-equipped or ill-equipped, and that schools are dilapidated and that it affects your daily life? What of those in the public service today who cannot get salaries paid because all these monies came from the public purse? "The point I am making is that we seem to want to eat an omelet without breaking eggs; that is what Nigerians want. There are Nigerians who say, 'Ooh, we are suffering a lot of hardship since the Buhari government came and that we are better off under corruption'. "Isn't that the most terrible thing for anybody to mouth, without considering what would have happened if Buhari had not come? If that had been the case, I don't think that there would have been a country today; I think that Zimbabwe would have been better because this is a government that is operating on little or no budget because by the time they came in, what was existing had been squandered completely and shared among those now being defended with cries of 'human rights'. "What I am saying is that it is very discouraging because if you are struggling for the masses of this country, for the welfare of Nigerians, for improvement of the standard of living and then you are not encouraged, the tendency is for you to give up. For people to prefer corruption to the integrity that we are seeing in government today is very shocking. And I can tell you that if I were in government, I would have been extremely discouraged. "We cannot have it both ways. We need the judiciary but we need an upright judiciary; without that, one arm of government would collapse; democracy would collapse. Let us think of the implication of what is going on. If we don't put the judiciary right and we don't have a judiciary in which we have confidence, a judiciary with integrity and honour, a judiciary with moral authority, then we have no government and we have no democracy." Sagay said it would have been unthinkable for the DSS to raid the homes of judges even under military rule when courts gave several verdicts against the government, all because of the high level of integrity the judges had. "You people remember the era of Justices Eso, Oputa, Aniagolu, Nnamani, Idigbe, Mohammed Bello and Obaseki? Which DSS would have dared to even question any of those people? Nobody! No agency of government would have dared it. They gave a lot of their judgments against the military government. I can cite over 20 judgments which they gave against military government. "They gave a judgment against Buhari's military government, saying he had no power to retire some people; the Manager of the Fire Service in Lagos, Garba. It was held that his retirement (by the military regime) was illegal. "I can cite so many. There was also Ojukwu's case and everybody knows that. It (Supreme Court) held that the powers that be, the military government, could not engage in self-help by preventing Ojukwu from living in his father's house. Ojukwu got judgment and instead of appealing, they went and threw him out. "Then, the Supreme Court held that for throwing him out and preventing him from accessing his father's house, rather than appealing that judgment, they (military) are deprived of the right to come to this court. "That moral authority has crashed and, therefore, having crashed, like a tree that has fallen, ants, lizards and all sorts of things can climb over it. You bring yourself down and then, whatever happens after that is your own fault. "The ordinary man like you and I could be guilty of corruption but a judge should never be guilty of corruption. Once a judge does that, he brings himself to our level and so cannot complain if he is treated the same way that you and I are treated. That is what has happened. Let us be objective and be fair to this country with our commentary and not be narrow-minded," Sagay said. PACAC Executive Secretary Prof Bolaji Owasanoye said the arrested judges should be suspended while their trial lasts and until they clear their names. He noted that a member of the committee had to step down when serious allegations were made against him. Owasanoye said: "The National Judicial Council (NJC) did not suggest in their response that they're suspending the judges. But what should be the proper thing? The proper thing, of course, is for the judges to be suspended. The reason is because all over the world, if a judge is going to be appearing before a court on criminal charges, you ask yourself, is it appropriate for the judge to continue to sit in another respect?" "I'm talking about best practices here. After all when other people are being tried, we argue that they should step down. We're not talking of an administrative issue here; we're talking about a crime. I think that the proper thing to do is actually for the judges to be given that charge to defend themselves. "In other climes, when a policy that somebody initiates does not even work well, they resign. David Cameron resigned simply because Britain voted to leave the European Union (Brexit). He didn't do anything wrong. Clearly, the honourable thing is for the NJC to give those judges an opportunity to go and defend themselves and then if they're cleared they can take back their jobs, strengthened. "Again, there are situations in which NJC has been investigating the judges behind the scene and technically has not allowed them to preside over cases, even though those allegations may not be criminal in nature. So is this not even much more sensitive and a more compelling reason to suspend them?" A PACAC member, Prof Femi Odekunle, said those faulting the judges' arrest missed the point. "There are those who are making arguments that amount to shenanigans, to shield people. Corruption in the judiciary is not the same as corruption in the marketplace; the judiciary is the soul of our nation. Therefore, anything that could be done with it should be done."  

Posted via Festechvibes panels.